Here's an example. Most toxicologists looking at the effects of heavy metals
on biological systems (e.g., phytoplankton or fish gill) will assume that the
toxic form of most metals is the free or aquo species (Me2+). Hydrolysis
products (i.e., MeOH+, Me(OH)2, Me(OH)3-, etc.) or complexes with other
ligands (e.g., SO42-, PO43-, or CO32-) are generally considered to be less
harmful. If you measure the pH and the total concentration of the different
chemical components in your system, you could use chemical equilibrium
modeling to calculate the amount of free metal ion that is present in your
system.
This is a vast improvement over just reporting the total concentration of a metal in relation to biological
response. By accounting for pH, all side reactions and the competition between metals for ligands, you
are able to arrive at a much more insightful description of the chemical environment -- and a much greater
ability to form hypotheses about how metals interact with organisms.
Here's an example. Most toxicologists looking at the effects of heavy
metals on biological systems (e.g., phytoplankton or fish gill) will assume
that the toxic form of most metals is the free or aquo species (Me2+).
Hydrolysis products (i.e., MeOH+, Me(OH)2, Me(OH)3-, etc.) or complexes
with other ligands (e.g., SO42-, PO43-, or CO32-) are generally considered
to
be less harmful. If you measure the pH and the total concentration of the
different chemical components in your system, you could use chemical equilibrium modeling to calculate
the amount of free metal ion that is present in your system.
This is a vast improvement over just reporting the total concentration of a metal in relation to biological
response. By accounting for pH, all side reactions and the competition between metals for ligands, you
are able to arrive at a much more insightful description of the chemical environment -- and a much greater
ability to form hypotheses about how metals interact with organisms.
Here's an example. Most toxicologists looking at the effects of heavy
metals on biological systems (e.g., phytoplankton or fish gill) will assume
that the toxic form of most metals is the free or aquo species (Me2+).
Hydrolysis products (i.e., MeOH+, Me(OH)2, Me(OH)3-, etc.) or complexes
with other ligands (e.g., SO42-, PO43-, or CO32-) are generally considered
to
be less harmful. If you measure the pH and the total concentration of the
different chemical components in your system, you could use chemical equilibrium modeling to calculate
the amount of free metal ion that is present in your system.
This is a vast improvement over just reporting the total concentration of a metal in relation to biological
response. By accounting for pH, all side reactions and the competition between metals for ligands, you
are able to arrive at a much more insightful description of the chemical environment -- and a much greater
ability to form hypotheses about how metals interact with organisms.
Here's an example. Most toxicologists looking at the effects of heavy
metals on biological systems (e.g., phytoplankton or fish gill) will assume
that the toxic form of most metals is the free or aquo species (Me2+).
Hydrolysis products (i.e., MeOH+, Me(OH)2, Me(OH)3-, etc.) or complexes
with other ligands (e.g., SO42-, PO43-, or CO32-) are generally considered
to
be less harmful. If you measure the pH and the total concentration of the
different chemical components in your system, you could use chemical equilibrium modeling to calculate
the amount of free metal ion that is present in your system.
This is a vast improvement over just reporting the total concentration of a metal in relation to biological
response. By accounting for pH, all side reactions and the competition between metals for ligands, you
are able to arrive at a much more insightful description of the chemical environment -- and a much greater
ability to form hypotheses about how metals interact with organisms.
Here's an example. Most toxicologists looking at the effects of heavy metals
on biological systems (e.g., phytoplankton or fish gill) will assume that the
toxic form of most metals is the free or aquo species (Me2+). Hydrolysis
products (i.e., MeOH+, Me(OH)2, Me(OH)3-, etc.) or complexes with other
ligands (e.g., SO42-, PO43-, or CO32-) are generally considered to be less
harmful. If you measure the pH and the total concentration of the different
chemical components in your system, you could use chemical equilibrium
modeling to calculate the amount of free metal ion that is present in your
system.
This is a vast improvement over just reporting the total concentration of a metal in relation to biological
response. By accounting for pH, all side reactions and the competition between metals for ligands, you
are able to arrive at a much more insightful description of the chemical environment -- and a much greater
ability to form hypotheses about how metals interact with organisms.
Here's an example. Most toxicologists looking at the effects of heavy metals
on biological systems (e.g., phytoplankton or fish gill) will assume that the
toxic form of most metals is the free or aquo species (Me2+). Hydrolysis
products (i.e., MeOH+, Me(OH)2, Me(OH)3-, etc.) or complexes with other
ligands (e.g., SO42-, PO43-, or CO32-) are generally considered to be less
harmful. If you measure the pH and the total concentration of the different
chemical components in your system, you could use chemical equilibrium
modeling to calculate the amount of free metal ion that is present in your
system.
This is a vast improvement over just reporting the total concentration of a metal in relation to biological
response. By accounting for pH, all side reactions and the competition between metals for ligands, you
are able to arrive at a much more insightful description of the chemical environment -- and a much greater
ability to form hypotheses about how metals interact with organisms.